A gem within wheel companies

"CCC (formerly CyclistCarCoexist)" (ccpbb) 12/25/2016 at 17:08 • Filed to: None

0

8

Stance wheels are the shit mate, and check out those wheel weights

Sovereign, Purveyor of Coupes > CCC (formerly CyclistCarCoexist) 12/25/2016 at 17:10

2

That looks extra double shit house with that tiny rotor.

Echo51 > Sovereign, Purveyor of Coupes 12/25/2016 at 17:15

1

Excactly the reason i won’t ride open 17", just too little brake to look good. 16" with big blocky spokes to hide them will do..

Batman the Horse > Sovereign, Purveyor of Coupes 12/25/2016 at 17:22

0

I’m assuming those are the rear rotors?

Sovereign, Purveyor of Coupes > Batman the Horse 12/25/2016 at 17:24

4

They likely are.

Still, open wheels like these look awful unless you have nice brakes to show off.

Twingo Tamer - About to descend into project car hell. > CCC (formerly CyclistCarCoexist) 12/25/2016 at 17:33

3

Is it just me or do these wheels seem a little weak. Id be hesitant to trust them on potholed roads or for track work.

CCC (formerly CyclistCarCoexist) > Twingo Tamer - About to descend into project car hell. 12/25/2016 at 17:55

2

There aren’t any standards wheel companies are required to adhere to in the U.S., some companies like OZ Racing and HRE get their wheels TUV (or JWL/VIA/Japan) certified to ensure customers their wheels aren’t shit.

Twingo Tamer - About to descend into project car hell. > CCC (formerly CyclistCarCoexist) 12/25/2016 at 17:58

0

Kind of worrying to be honest. Maybe these ones are fine but I’d want to at least see some FEA results before putting them on my car. But wheel failure is a thing and there should really be a standard for them.

awmaster10 > CCC (formerly CyclistCarCoexist) 12/25/2016 at 22:54

0

dont listen to the haters, i think they look great. But whats so special about the wheels weights?